Journal article

Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes


Authors listWern, M; Hoppe, T; Becker, J; Zahn, S; Mollenhauer, D; Schindler, S

Publication year2016

Pages3384-3388

JournalEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Volume number2016

Issue number21

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614

PublisherWiley-VCH Verlag


Abstract

In contrast to dinuclear (disulfido)copper complexes related trisulfido
compounds have not been reported so far. Here we describe two new
complexes of this type, [Cu2(tmpa)2S3](SbF6)2 {tmpa = tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine} and [Cu2(tet b)2S3](OTf)2 (tet b = rac‐5,5,7,12,12,14‐hexamethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane),
that have been investigated and could be structurally characterized.
Furthermore, the reactivity of these complexes towards dioxygen showed
that the corresponding (peroxido)copper complexes formed. Depending on
the stoichiometric conditions (excess of sulfur) mononuclear end‐on
(sulfido)copper complexes were detected spectroscopically. DFT
calculations were performed and supported the experimental results.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleWern, M., Hoppe, T., Becker, J., Zahn, S., Mollenhauer, D. and Schindler, S. (2016) Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2016(21), pp. 3384-3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614

APA Citation styleWern, M., Hoppe, T., Becker, J., Zahn, S., Mollenhauer, D., & Schindler, S. (2016). Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2016(21), 3384-3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 15:21