Journal article

Authors list: Graulich, Nicole; Lieber, Leonie

Publication year: 2024

Journal: Frontiers in Education

Volume number: 9

eISSN: 2504-284X

Open access status: Gold

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1374793

Publisher: Frontiers Media

Abstract: 
When working with domain-specific representations such as structural molecular representations and reaction mechanisms, learners need to be engaged in multiple cognitive operations, from attending to relevant areas of representations, linking implicit information to structural features, and making meaningful connections between information and reaction processes. For these processes, appropriate instruction, such as a clever task design, becomes a crucial factor for successful learning. Chemistry learning, and especially organic chemistry, merely addressed meaningful task design in classes, often using more reproduction-oriented predict-the-product tasks. In recent years, rethinking task design has become a major focus for instructional design in chemistry education research. Thus, this perspective aims to illustrate the theoretical underpinning of comparing cases from different perspectives, such as the structure-mapping theory, the cognitive load theory, and the variation theory, and outlines, based on the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, how instructors can support their students. Variations of this task design in the chemistry classroom and recommendations for teaching with case comparisons based on current state-of-the-art evidence from research studies in chemistry education research are provided.

Harvard Citation style: Graulich, N. and Lieber, L. (2024) Why comparing matters - on case comparisons in organic chemistry, Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1374793. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1374793

APA Citation style: Graulich, N., & Lieber, L. (2024). Why comparing matters - on case comparisons in organic chemistry. Frontiers in Education. 9, Article 1374793. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1374793