Journal article

The logical foundations of constitutional democracy between legal positivism and natural law theory


Authors listKliemt, Hartmut

Publication year2023

Pages269-281

JournalPublic Choice

Volume number195

Issue number3-4

ISSN0048-5829

eISSN1573-7101

Open access statusHybrid

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00888-9

PublisherSpringer


Abstract
Rejecting all knowledge claims concerning right and wrong in matters practical James Buchanan concurred with legal positivism that invalid law cannot be identified by its substantive content but only by an inherited defect in its factual creation. Beyond correct creation Buchanan proposed as a quasi-natural law constraint that unanimity in the shadow of individual veto power must at least be conceivable if a norm is to be law. The emerging hybrid conception of constitutional law is symptomatic for Buchanan's never-ending but ultimately futile efforts to incorporate Kantian ideals of interpersonal respect into constitutional economics without imposing them as personal values.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKliemt, H. (2023) The logical foundations of constitutional democracy between legal positivism and natural law theory, Public Choice, 195(3-4), pp. 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00888-9

APA Citation styleKliemt, H. (2023). The logical foundations of constitutional democracy between legal positivism and natural law theory. Public Choice. 195(3-4), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00888-9



Keywords

  
Go to first page
  
Go to previous page
  
1 of 2
  
Go to next page
  
Go to last page
  


Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:23