Journalartikel

Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes


AutorenlisteWern, M; Hoppe, T; Becker, J; Zahn, S; Mollenhauer, D; Schindler, S

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2016

Seiten3384-3388

ZeitschriftEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry

Bandnummer2016

Heftnummer21

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614

VerlagWiley-VCH Verlag


Abstract

In contrast to dinuclear (disulfido)copper complexes related trisulfido
compounds have not been reported so far. Here we describe two new
complexes of this type, [Cu2(tmpa)2S3](SbF6)2 {tmpa = tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine} and [Cu2(tet b)2S3](OTf)2 (tet b = rac‐5,5,7,12,12,14‐hexamethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane),
that have been investigated and could be structurally characterized.
Furthermore, the reactivity of these complexes towards dioxygen showed
that the corresponding (peroxido)copper complexes formed. Depending on
the stoichiometric conditions (excess of sulfur) mononuclear end‐on
(sulfido)copper complexes were detected spectroscopically. DFT
calculations were performed and supported the experimental results.




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilWern, M., Hoppe, T., Becker, J., Zahn, S., Mollenhauer, D. and Schindler, S. (2016) Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2016(21), pp. 3384-3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614

APA-ZitierstilWern, M., Hoppe, T., Becker, J., Zahn, S., Mollenhauer, D., & Schindler, S. (2016). Sulfur versus Dioxygen: Dinuclear (Trisulfido)copper Complexes. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2016(21), 3384-3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600614



Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-21-05 um 15:21